Balancing needs and wants: an examination of resource allocation and stewardship in local church ministries.
I. Resource allocation
The
church has the mission to make disciples of all nations (Mt 28:18-20). This is
our FFMC vision. We are to baptize people (a one-off event) and to teach them to
observe all that Jesus has taught (a continuing work).
All
local churches therefore have ministries that focus on outreach to
non-believers as well as ministries to disciple believers. In addition, there
are ministries of the church that are administrative or operational in nature.
We
affirm that all these ministries are of value, although the importance of
particular ministries may differ according to institutional factors (e.g.
mandated ministries in the Methodist Book of Discipline) as well as with the
needs of the moment (e.g. China CN ministry). We have previously said that all
ministries must be aligned to the overall disciplemaking vision of the church
(LCEC retreat May 2013). We said that:
•
All activities and ministries must have a disciplemaking purpose
•
All activities and ministries must be constantly evaluated with regard
to their effectiveness in disciplemaking.
•
No activity or ministry can be stand-alone, without consideration for
its overall place in a disciplemaking church and its relationship to other
activities or ministries in church
All
ministries are to work harmoniously together for the good of the church as a
whole. The needs of one particular ministry cannot be given undue prominence
over the needs of the church as a whole.
Each
local church must prayerfully seek how to balance its available budget and
manpower resources to keep its different ministries going. Depending on the situation
and calling of the church for a particular season, resources should be
channelled to different ministries in different proportions. There may even be
occasions when some ministries need to be closed while others are started. The
need for some ministries will change over time (e.g. Kindergarten, FFPP). If a
ministry is not self-sustaining and growing because of lack of leadership or
lack of members, this may be an indication that it is no longer fulfilling a
needed role in disciplemaking in the local church The LCEC must not operate
like a parliament where members represent the narrow interests of particular
constituency. We must strive to think of the good of the whole church even as
we represent particular ministries in the LCEC. This will mean that we should
not need to feel resentful or ashamed if the ministries we lead are closed for
various reasons.
The
people of God are also gifted differently (1 Cor 12:27-30) and the local church
must encourage all its members to join the different ministries for which they
are individually gifted. No single ministry should require or expect that the
congregation as a whole have a special concern for it. Ministry leaders must to
move away from a position of always feeling the need for and asking for help
“from the church” and feeling disappointment when such support is not forthcoming.
We should instead be exercising independent leadership by asking how we can
work together with other ministries, identifying and equipping members of the
congregation who fit into our ministry, training leaders to succeed us and praying
for our ministry, and so on. Each leader should also be thinking about the role
their ministry plays in church and ask hard questions of themselves if things
seem difficult.
II. Stewardship
FFMC
is a largely-middle class church. In our daily lives we are accustomed to a
certain standard of living. Many of us own cars. We work and live in
air-conditioned environments. We often take holidays overseas. We may eat in
restaurants rather than only in hawker centres. We take this standard of living
as a norm. We then have to ask ourselves how we can justify this level of
comfort and convenience in a world full of suffering and poor people.
This
issue extends to our level of comfort and convenience in church. Why have an
air-conditioning in church? Why have free buffet dinners for the LCEC? Why go
overseas for various ministry retreats when we can meet for free in church? Why
not encourage our members to ‘live simply so that others may simply live’
(Ghandi). Are we not to be like the rich young ruler (Lk 18:22) in selling all
we have and giving to the poor? I think the simple answer is that this is not warranted
by an examination of Scripture. We are told not to desire to be rich (1 Ti
6:9), but at the same time, that there are rich Christians (1 Ti 6:17). The
wealthy are encouraged to share their wealth with the poor (2 Cor 8:13-14), but
they are not commanded to share their wealth so that there will be equality
among all people. They are commanded instead to do good works and to be
generous in giving (1 Ti 6:8). The economy of the kingdom of God is not
communist!
This
leads me to think of the following principles with respect to our spending
practices that may be construed as being overly lavish and imprudent.
1. Our
self-indulgent ‘luxuries’ must be outmatched by our giving as a church
2. Our
current practices must not be to reach a level beyond our usual standard of
living, lest it be seen that we are using church funds to gain us unwarranted privileges.
3. Our
practices must not exist for their own sake, but in order for effective and
joyful fulfilment of the ministries of the church. (‘beneficial’) (1 Co 6:12). Here,
efficiency is not the same as effectiveness. For example, much may be
accomplished at a stay-in retreat that cannot be done in meetings in church.
4. Our
practices must not be clung on to (1 Co 6:12) as a right that cannot be taken
away, but as a privilege.
5. They
must be of a nature where we can be thankful to God for them (1 Cor 10:29-30)
without needing to make excuses for them to others.
6. They
must be able to be done to the glory of God (1 Cor 10:31).
7. They
must be done so as not to give offence to the church of God (1 Cor 10:32) or to
unnecessarily stumble others who are weaker in faith (Rom 14:13-23)
8. The
level of luxury we permit ourselves then must be one that is commonly agreed on
as consistent with the culture of our church. Once this is discussed and agreed
on, all should accept it in unity.
Comments
Post a Comment